banner



Home  ›  Is The Animal Liberation Front A Terrorist Group In All Countries

Is The Animal Liberation Front A Terrorist Group In All Countries

Written By Friday, July 1, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Animal rights straight action organisation

Animal Liberation Front
ALF logo.svg
Founded June 1976; 46 years ago  (1976-06)
Focus Animal rights
Location
  • Active in over 40 countries
Origins Britain
Method Directly action
Website https://animalliberationfrontline.com/

The Brute Liberation Forepart (ALF) is an international, leaderless, decentralized political and social resistance movement that engages in and promotes not-violent direct activity in protest against incidents of animal cruelty. Information technology originated in the 1970s from the Bands of Mercy. Participants country it is a modernistic-day Undercover Railroad, removing animals from laboratories and farms, destroying facilities, arranging safe houses, veterinarian care and operating sanctuaries where the animals after live.[ii] [three] [4] [five] Critics accept labelled them every bit eco-terrorists.[6] [7] [8] [ix]

Agile in over 40 countries, ALF cells operate clandestinely, consisting of modest groups of friends and sometimes just 1 person, which makes the movement difficult for the regime to monitor. Robin Webb of the Animal Liberation Printing Part has said: "That is why the ALF cannot be smashed, it cannot be effectively infiltrated, it cannot be stopped. You, each and every i of you: you lot are the ALF."[10]

Activists say the move is non-violent. According to the ALF's code, any act that furthers the crusade of animal liberation, where all reasonable precautions are taken non to harm man or not-homo life, may be claimed as an ALF action, including acts of vandalism causing economical damage.[i] American activist Rod Coronado said in 2006: "One thing that I know that separates us from the people we are constantly accused of existence—that is, terrorists, violent criminals—is the fact that nosotros have harmed no one."[11]

There has notwithstanding been widespread criticism that ALF spokespersons and activists take either failed to condemn acts of violence or have themselves engaged in it, either in the name of the ALF or under another banner. The criticism has been accompanied past dissent within the animal rights movement itself about the use of violence, and increasing attention from the constabulary and intelligence communities. In 2002 the Southern Poverty Law Eye (SPLC), which monitors extremism in the United States, noted the involvement of the ALF in the Stop Huntingdon Beast Cruelty campaign, which SPLC identified as using terrorist tactics—though a later SPLC report also noted that they have not killed anyone.[6] In 2005 the ALF was included in a The states Department of Homeland Security planning document listing a number of domestic terrorist threats on which the U.S. regime expected to focus resources.[seven] In the U.k., ALF deportment are regarded every bit examples of domestic extremism, and are handled by the National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit, set in 2004 to monitor ALF and other illegal animal rights activeness.[eight] [12]

Origins [edit]

Band of Mercy [edit]

The roots of the ALF trace back to December 1963, when British announcer John Prestige was assigned to cover a Devon and Somerset Staghounds event, where he watched hunters chase and kill a meaning deer. In protest, he formed the Hunt Saboteurs Association (HSA), which evolved into groups of volunteers trained to thwart the hunts' hounds by blowing horns and laying simulated scents.[xiii]

Beast rights writer Noel Molland writes that one of these HSA groups was formed in 1971 by a law pupil from Luton named Ronnie Lee. In 1972, Lee and swain activist Cliff Goodman decided more militant tactics were needed. They revived the proper noun of a 19th-century RSPCA youth grouping, The Bands of Mercy, and with about one-half a dozen activists set up upward the Band of Mercy, which attacked hunters' vehicles by slashing tires and breaking windows, designed to stop the hunt from even showtime, rather than thwarting information technology one time underway.[14]

In 1973, the Band learned that Hoechst Pharmaceuticals was building a research laboratory near Milton Keynes. On 10 November 1973, two activists set burn to the building, causing £26,000 worth of impairment, returning half dozen days later to prepare burn to what was left of it. Information technology was the beast liberation movement's starting time known deed of arson. In June 1974, two Band activists set fire to boats taking function in the annual seal cull off the coast of Norfolk, which Molland writes was the final fourth dimension the choose took place. Between June and Baronial 1974, the Ring launched eight raids against animate being-testing laboratories, and others against chicken breeders and gun shops, damaging buildings or vehicles. Its first act of "animal liberation" took place during the same period when activists removed half a dozen guinea pigs from a guinea squealer farm in Wiltshire, after which the owner closed the business concern, fearing farther incidents. Then, as at present, property criminal offense caused a split within the fledgling motion. In July 1974, the Chase Saboteurs Association offered a £250 advantage for information leading to the identification of the Ring of Mercy, telling the printing, "Nosotros approve of their ethics, but are opposed to their methods."[15]

ALF formed [edit]

In August 1974, Lee and Goodman were arrested for taking part in a raid on Oxford Laboratory Animal Colonies in Bicester, earning them the moniker the "Bicester Two." Daily demonstrations took place outside the court during their trial; Lee's local Labour MP, Ivor Clemitson, was one of their supporters. They were sentenced to three years in prison, during which Lee went on the move'due south start hunger strike to obtain vegan food and clothing. They were paroled later 12 months, Lee emerging in the spring of 1976 more militant than ever. He gathered together the remaining Band of Mercy activists and 2 dozen new recruits, 30 in all. Molland writes that the Ring of Mercy name sounded wrong as a clarification of what Lee saw every bit a revolutionary movement. Lee wanted a proper name that would haunt those who used animals, according to Molland. Thus, the Animal Liberation Front was born.[15] [xvi]

Structure and aims [edit]

Surreptitious and above-basis [edit]

The movement has cloak-and-dagger and higher up-ground components, and is entirely decentralized with no formal hierarchy, the absence of which acts as a firebreak when it comes to legal responsibility. Volunteers are expected to stick to the ALF's stated aims when using its banner:

  • To inflict economical impairment on those who profit from the misery and exploitation of animals.
  • To liberate animals from places of corruption, i.e. laboratories, mill farms, fur farms etc., and place them in good homes where they may alive out their natural lives, free from suffering.
  • To reveal the horror and atrocities committed against animals behind locked doors, past performing irenic direct actions and liberations
  • To take all necessary precautions confronting harming whatever animate being, human being and non-human.
  • Any grouping of people who are vegans and who carry out actions according to ALF guidelines have the right to regard themselves as role of the ALF.[i]

A number of above-ground groups exist to support covert volunteers. The Animal Liberation Front Supporters Group (ALF SG) adopts activists in jail equally prisoners of conscience; anyone tin can join the ALFSG for a small monthly fee. The Vegan Prisoners Support Group, created in 1994 when British activist Keith Mann was first jailed, works with prison house regime in the Britain to ensure that ALF prisoners have admission to vegan supplies. The Brute Liberation Press Office receives and publicizes bearding communiqués from volunteers; it operates every bit an ostensibly independent group funded by public donations, though the High Court in London ruled in 2006 that its press officer in the UK, Robin Webb, was a pivotal figure in the ALF.[17]

At that place are three publications associated with the ALF. Arkangel was a British bi-annual magazine founded by Ronnie Lee. Bite Dorsum is a website where activists exit claims of responsibleness; it published a "Direct Activity Report" in 2005 stating that, in 2004 alone, ALF activists had removed 17,262 animals from facilities, and had claimed 554 acts of vandalism and arson. No Compromise is a San Francisco-based website that likewise reports on ALF actions.[18]

Philosophy of direct action [edit]

ALF activists argue that animals should not be viewed every bit property, and that scientists and industry have no right to assume buying of living beings who are the "subjects-of-a-life" in the words of philosopher Tom Regan.[19] In the view of the ALF, to fail to recognize this is an case of speciesism—the ascription of different values to beings on the basis of their species membership alone, which they argue is as ethically flawed as racism or sexism. They reject the animal welfarist position that more humane treatment is needed for animals; they say their aim is empty cages, non bigger ones. Activists argue that the animals they remove from laboratories or farms are "liberated," not "stolen," because they were never rightfully owned in the first place.[20]

Labs raided, locks glued, products spiked, depots ransacked, windows smashed, construction halted, mink set costless, fences torn down, cabs burnt out, offices in flames, machine tyres es slashed, cages emptied, phone lines severed, slogans daubed, muck spread, harm done, electrics cutting, site flooded, chase dogs stolen, fur coats slashed, buildings destroyed, foxes freed, kennels attacked, businesses burgled, uproar, anger, outrage, balaclava clad thugs. It'due south an ALF affair! — Keith Isle of man[21]

Although the ALF members reject violence against people, many activists support property crime, comparing the destruction of animate being laboratories and other facilities to resistance fighters blowing upwardly gas chambers in Nazi Germany.[22] Their statement for sabotage is that the removal of animals from a laboratory simply ways they will exist quickly replaced, but if the laboratory itself is destroyed, it not only slows downward the restocking process, but increases costs, maybe to the betoken of making animal research prohibitively expensive; this, they argue, volition encourage the search for alternatives. An ALF activist involved in an arson set on on the Academy of Arizona told No Compromise in 1996: "[I]t is much the same thing as the abolitionists who fought against slavery going in and burning downwardly the quarters or trigger-happy down the auction block ... Sometimes when you only take animals and exercise zippo else, maybe that is not equally strong a message."[23]

The provision against violence in the ALF code has triggered divisions inside the move and allegations of hypocrisy from the ALF's critics. In 1998, terrorism expert Paul Wilkinson called the ALF and its splinter groups "the most serious domestic terrorist threat inside the U.k.."[24] In 1993, ALF was listed as an organization that has "claimed to have perpetrated acts of extremism in the United states of america" in the Report to Congress on the Extent and Effects of Domestic and International Terrorism on Animal Enterprises.[25] It was named as a terrorist threat past the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in Jan 2005.[26] In March 2005, a speech from the Counterterrorism Partition of the FBI stated that: "The eco-terrorist movement has given rise and notoriety to groups such every bit the Fauna Liberation Forepart, or ALF, and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF). These groups exist to commit serious acts of vandalism, and to harass and intimidate owners and employees of the business sector."[27] In hearings held on xviii May 2005, before a Senate panel, officials of the FBI and the Agency of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) stated that "violent animate being rights extremists and eco-terrorists now pose ane of the most serious terrorism threats to the nation."[28] [29] The use of the terrorist label has been criticized, however; the Southern Poverty Police force Center, which tracks U.S. domestic extremism, writes that "for all the property damage they have wreaked, eco-radicals accept killed no one."[6] Philosopher and brute rights activist Steven Best writes that "given the enormity and magnitude of animal suffering . . . one should notice that the ALF has demonstrated remarkable restraint in their war of liberation."[30]

Best and trauma surgeon Jerry Vlasak, both of whom have volunteered for the N American press role, were banned from inbound the Britain in 2004 and 2005 after making statements that appeared to back up violence against people. Vlasak told an animal rights conferences in 2003: "I don't think you'd have to kill—assassinate—besides many vivisectors before y'all would see a marked subtract in the amount of vivisection going on. And I recollect for five lives, 10 lives, fifteen human lives, nosotros could salvage a one thousand thousand, two million, 10 million non-human being animals."[31] Best coined the term "extensional self-defence force" to describe actions carried out in defense of animals by human beings interim every bit proxies. He argues that activists have the moral right to appoint in acts of sabotage or even violence because animals are unable to fight dorsum themselves. Best argues that the principle of extensional self-defense mirrors the penal code statues known equally the necessity defense force, which can be invoked when a accused believes the illegal act was necessary to avert imminent and groovy harm.[32] [33] Best argues that "extensional self defense" is not just a theory, but put into practice in some African countries, where hired armed soldiers occasionally use lethal force confronting poachers who would kill rhinos, elephants and other endangered animals for their trunk parts to be sold in international markets.[34]

The nature of the ALF every bit a leaderless resistance ways support for Vlasak and Best is difficult to measure. An anonymous volunteer interviewed in 2005 for CBS's threescore Minutes said of Vlasak: "[H]e doesn't operate with our endorsement or our support or our appreciation, the support of the ALF. We have a strict code of non-violence ... I don't know who put Dr. Vlasak in the position he'south in. It wasn't united states of america, the ALF."[35]

Philosopher Peter Singer of Princeton Academy has argued that ALF direct action tin only exist regarded as a just cause if information technology is non-trigger-happy, and that the ALF is at its almost effective when uncovering show of beast abuse that other tactics could not expose. He cites 1984's "Unnecessary Fuss" campaign, when ALF raided the University of Pennsylvania'south head-injury research clinic and removed footage showing researchers laughing at the brain impairment of witting baboons, as an instance. The academy responded that the handling of the animals conformed to National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines, only as a event of the publicity, the lab was airtight downward, the chief veterinarian fired, and the university placed on probation. Barbara Orlans, a former brute researcher with the NIH, now with the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, writes that the example stunned the biomedical community, and is today considered one of the most meaning cases in the ideals of using animals in inquiry.[36] Singer argues that if the ALF would focus on this kind of straight activity, instead of sabotage, it would appeal to the minds of reasonable people. Against this, Steven All-time writes that industries and governments take too much institutional and fiscal bias for reason to prevail.[37]

Peter Hughes of the University of Sunderland cites a 1988 raid in the U.k. led past ALF activist Barry Horne as an example of positive ALF straight activeness. Horne and four other activists decided to free Rocky, a dolphin who had lived in a pocket-sized physical pool in Marineland in Morecambe for 20 years, by moving him 180 metres (590 ft) from his pool to the sea.[38] [39] The police spotted them carrying a bootleg dolphin stretcher, and they were convicted of conspiracy to steal, but they continued to campaign for Rocky's release. Marineland eventually agreed to sell him for £120,000, money that was raised with the help of the Born Costless Foundation and the Mail on Lord's day, and in 1991 Rocky was transferred to an 80-acre (320,000 mii) lagoon reserve in the Turks and Caicos Islands, then released. Hughes writes that the ALF action helped to create a paradigm shift in the Britain toward seeing dolphins equally "individual actors", equally a event of which, he writes, there are at present no captive dolphins in the UK.[40]

Early on tactics and ideology [edit]

Rachel Monaghan of the University of Ulster writes that, in their first year of performance alone, ALF actions accounted for £250,000 worth of damage, targeting butchers shops, furriers, circuses, slaughterhouses, breeders, and fast-nutrient restaurants. She writes that the ALF philosophy was that violence can only have identify confronting sentient life forms, and therefore focusing on property destruction and the removal of animals from laboratories and farms was consistent with a philosophy of non-violence, despite the harm they were causing.[xvi] In 1974, Ronnie Lee insisted that direct action exist "limited only by reverence of life and hatred of violence", and in 1979, he wrote that many ALF raids had been chosen off because of the adventure to life.[41]

Kim Stallwood, a national organiser for the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) in the 1980s, writes that the public'due south response to early ALF raids that removed animals was very positive, in large measure considering of the not-violence policy. When Mike Huskisson removed iii beagles from a tobacco study at ICI in June 1975, the media portrayed him as a hero.[42] [43] Robin Webb writes that ALF volunteers were viewed equally the "Robin Hoods of the animate being welfare world".[44]

Stallwood writes that they saw ALF activism as part of their opposition to the state, rather than as an end-in-itself, and did not desire to adhere to non-violence.[42] In the early 1980s, the BUAV, an anti-vivisection group founded by Frances Power Cobbe in 1898, was among the ALF's supporters. Stallwood writes that it donated function of its office space rent-complimentary to the ALF Supporters Group, and gave ALF actions uncritical support in its newspaper, The Liberator. In 1982, a group of ALF activists, including Roger Yates, at present a sociologist at University College, Dublin, and Dave McColl, a director of Body of water Shepherd Conservation Society, became members of the BUAV'south executive commission, and used their position to radicalize the organization.[45] Stallwood writes that the new executive believed all political action to be a waste material of fourth dimension, and wanted the BUAV to devote its resource exclusively to straight action. Whereas the earliest activists had been committed to rescuing animals, and destroyed property simply where information technology contributed to the former, by the mid-1980s, Stallwood believed the ALF had lost its ethical foundation, and had go an opportunity "for misfits and misanthropes to seek personal revenge for some perceived social injustice". He writes: "Where was the intelligent debate about tactics and strategies that went across the mindless rhetoric and emotional elitism pervading much of the self-produced direct activeness literature? In brusk, what had happened to the animals' interests?" In 1984, the BUAV board reluctantly voted to expel the ALF SG from its premises and withdraw its political support, after which, Stallwood writes, the ALF became increasingly isolated.[46]

Evolution of the ALF in the U.S. [edit]

There are conflicting accounts of when the ALF first emerged in the United states of america. The FBI writes that brute rights activists had a history of committing low-level criminal activeness in the U.S. dating dorsum to the 1970s.[47] Freeman Wicklund and Kim Stallwood say the start ALF action there was on May 29, 1977, when researchers Ken LeVasseur and Steve Sipman released two dolphins, Puka and Kea, into the bounding main from the University of Hawaii's Marine Mammal Laboratory.[48] The North American Animal Liberation Printing Office attributes the dolphin release to a group called Undersea Railroad, and says the first ALF action was, in fact, a raid on the New York University Medical Centre on March xiv, 1979, when activists removed one cat, two dogs, and 2 guinea pigs.[49]

Kathy Snow Guillermo writes in Monkey Business organisation that the beginning ALF action was the removal on September 22, 1981, of the Silver Jump monkeys, 17 lab monkeys in the legal custody of People for the Upstanding Treatment of Animals (PETA), later on a researcher who had been experimenting on them was arrested for declared violations of cruelty legislation. When the court ruled that the monkeys be returned to the researcher, they mysteriously disappeared, only to reappear five days later when PETA learned that legal action against the researcher could not proceed without the monkeys as evidence.[50] Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, writes that the get-go ALF cell was ready up in late 1982, after a police force officer she calls "Valerie" responded to the publicity triggered by the Silverish Spring monkeys example, and flew to England to be trained by the ALF. Posing every bit a reporter, Valerie was put in impact with Ronnie Lee by Kim Stallwood, who at the time was working for the BUAV. Lee directed her to a training camp, where she was taught how to break into laboratories. Newkirk writes that Valerie returned to Maryland and set upward an ALF jail cell, with the beginning raid taking place on December 24, 1982, against Howard University, where 24 cats were removed, some of whose dorsum legs had been crippled.[48] [51] Jo Shoesmith, an American chaser and animal rights activist, says Newkirk's account of "Valerie" is not just fictionalized, equally Newkirk acknowledges, only totally fictitious.[52]

Ii early ALF raids led to the closure of several university studies. A May 28, 1984, raid on the Academy of Pennsylvania's head injury clinic caused $60,000 worth of damage and saw the removal of 60 hours of tapes, which showed the researchers laughing equally they used a hydraulic device to cause brain damage to baboons.[53] The tapes were turned over to PETA, who produced a 26-infinitesimal video chosen Unnecessary Fuss. The head injury clinic was airtight, the university's primary veterinarian was fired, and the academy was put on probation.[54]

On April 20, 1985, acting on a tip-off from a pupil, the ALF raided a laboratory in the University of California, Riverside, causing $700,000 in damages and removing 468 animals.[55] [56] [57] These included Britches, a five-calendar week-old macaque, who had been separated from his mother at birth and left alone with his eyes sewn shut and a sonar device on his head every bit part of a study into blindness. The raid, which was taped by the ALF, caused viii of the laboratory'southward seventeen active research projects to be shut down, and the academy said years of medical research were lost. The raid prompted National Institutes of Wellness director James Wyngaarden to contend that the raids should be regarded as acts of terrorism.[58] [59]

Animal Rights Militia and Justice Department [edit]

Monaghan writes that, effectually 1982, in that location was a noticeable shift in the non-vehement position, and non 1 canonical past everyone in the movement. Some activists began to make personal threats against individuals, followed by letter of the alphabet bombs and threats to contaminate food, the latter representing all the same another shift to threatening the general public, rather than specific targets.[16]

In 1982, letter bombs were sent to all iv major party leaders in the United kingdom, including Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. The offset major food scare happened in Nov 1984, with the ALF claiming to the media that information technology had contaminated Mars Bars as office of a campaign to force the Mars company to stop conducting tooth decay tests on monkeys. On November 17, the Sunday Mirror received a call from the ALF proverb it had injected Mars Bars in stores throughout the country with rat poison. The call was followed by a letter of the alphabet containing a Mars Bar, presumed to be contaminated, and the merits that these were on sale in London, Leeds, York, Southampton, and Coventry. Millions of bars were removed from shelves and Mars halted production, at a cost to the visitor of $4.5 meg.[sixty] [61] The ALF admitted the claims had been a hoax. Like contamination claims were later fabricated against L'Oréal and Lucozade.[62]

The letter bombs were claimed by the Animal Rights Militia (ARM), although the initial statement in November 1984 past David Mellor, then a Home Office minister, stated that information technology was the Beast Liberation Front who had claimed responsibleness.[63] [60] This is an early on case of the shifting of responsibility from one banner to another depending on the nature of the act, with the ARM and another nom de guerre, the Justice Section—the latter first used in 1993—emerging as names for direct action that violated the ALF'southward "no damage to living beings" principle. Ronnie Lee, who had before insisted on the importance of the ALF's non-violence policy, seemed to back up the idea. An commodity signed by RL—presumed to be Ronnie Lee—in the October 1984 ALF Supporters Group newsletter, suggested that activists set up "fresh groups ... under new names whose policies do not preclude the utilise of violence toward animal abusers".[64]

No activist is known to take conducted operations under both the ALF and ARM banners, merely overlap is assumed. Terrorism expert Paul Wilkinson has written that the ALF, the Justice Department, and the ARM are essentially the same thing,[65] and Robert Garner of the University of Leicester writes that it would be pointless to debate otherwise, given the nature of the movement as a leaderless resistance. Robin Webb of the British Animal Liberation Press Part has acknowledged that the activists may be the same people: "If someone wishes to deed as the Animal Rights Militia or the Justice Department, simply put, the ... policy of the Fauna Liberation Front end, to take all reasonable precautions not to endanger life, no longer applies."[66]

From 1983 onwards, a series of fire bombs exploded in department stores that sold fur, with the intention of triggering the sprinkler systems in order to cause impairment, although several stores were partly or completely destroyed.[67] In September 1985, incendiary devices were placed under the cars of Sharat Gangoli and Stuart Walker, both animal researchers with the British Industrial Biological Research Association (BIBRA), wrecking both vehicles but with no injuries, and the ARM claimed responsibleness. In January 1986, the ARM said it had placed devices under the cars of four employees of Huntingdon Life Sciences, timed to explode an hour apart from each other. A further device was placed nether the machine of Andor Sebesteny, a researcher for the Royal Cancer Research Fund, which he spotted earlier it exploded.[68] The next major attacks on individual researchers took place in 1990, when the cars of 2 veterinarian researchers were destroyed by sophisticated explosive devices in two separate explosions.[69] In Feb 1989, an explosion damaged the Senate Business firm bar in Bristol University, an attack claimed by the unknown "Animal Driveling Social club".[69] In June 1990, two days apart, bombs exploded in the cars of Margaret Baskerville, a veterinary surgeon working at Porton Downward, a chemical inquiry defence institution, and Patrick Max Headley, a physiologist at Bristol University. Baskerville escaped without injury by jumping through the window of her mini-jeep when a flop using a mercury-tilt device exploded next to the fuel tank. During the attack on Headley—which New Scientist writes involved the employ of plastic explosives—a 13-month-quondam baby in a push-chair suffered flash burns, shrapnel wounds, and a partially severed finger.[69] A wave of letter bombs followed in 1993, one of which was opened by the head of the Hereford site of GlaxoSmithKline, causing burns to his hands and face. Eleven similar devices were intercepted in postal sorting offices.[69]

False flags and plausible deniability [edit]

The nature of the ALF exposes its name to the run a risk of being used by activists who reject its not-violence platform, or by opponents conducting so-called "faux-flag" operations, designed to make the ALF announced fierce. That same doubt provides genuine ALF activists with plausible deniability should an operation go wrong, by denying that the act was "authentically ALF".[seventy]

Several incidents in 1989 and 1990 were described by the motion as false flag operations. In February 1989, an explosion damaged the Senate House bar in Bristol University, an set on claimed by the unknown "Animal Abused Society". In June 1990, 2 days apart, bombs exploded in the cars of Margaret Baskerville, a veterinarian surgeon working at Porton Downwardly, a chemical research defence establishment, and Patrick Max Headley, a professor of physiology at Bristol Academy. Baskerville escaped without injury by jumping through the window of her mini-jeep when a bomb using a mercury-tilt device exploded adjacent to the fuel tank. During the attack on Headley—which New Scientist writes involved the use of plastic explosives—a 13-month-old baby in a push-chair suffered flash burns, shrapnel wounds to his dorsum, and a partially severed finger.[71]

No known entity claimed responsibility for the attacks, which were condemned within the creature rights movement and by ALF activists. Keith Mann writes that it did non seem plausible that activists known for making uncomplicated incendiary devices from household components would suddenly switch to mercury-tilt switches and plastic explosives, and so never exist heard from once again. A few days after the bombings, the unknown "British Animal Rights Society" claimed responsibility for having attached a blast flop to a Huntsman'south State Rover in Somerset. Forensic testify led law to arrest the owner of the vehicle, who admitted he had bombed his own car to discredit the beast rights motility, and asked for two like offences to be taken into consideration. He was jailed for nine months. The Baskerville and Headley bombers were never apprehended.[72]

In 2018 the London Metropolitan Law apologised for the activities of i of their undercover agents who had infiltrated the group. A police officeholder using the proper name "Christine Green" had been involved in the illegal release of a large number of mink from a farm in Ringwood in 1998. The mission had been approved by senior officers in the police force.[73]

1996–present [edit]

Holding devastation began to increase substantially subsequently several high-profile campaigns closed down facilities perceived to be abusive to animals. Consort Kennels, a facility breeding beagles for animal testing; Hillgrove Farm, which bred cats; and Newchurch Subcontract, which bred republic of guinea pigs, were all closed after being targeted by creature rights campaigns that appeared to involve the ALF. In the UK, the financial twelvemonth 1991–1992 saw around 100 refrigerated meat trucks destroyed by incendiary devices at a price of around £five meg. Butchers' locks were superglued, shrink-wrapped meats were pierced in supermarkets, slaughterhouses and refrigerated meat trucks were fix on fire.[74]

In 1999, ALF activists became involved in the international Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) campaign to close Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS), Europe'southward largest beast-testing laboratory. The Southern Poverty Law Centre, which monitors U.S. domestic extremism, has described SHAC'due south modus operandi equally "frankly terroristic tactics like to those of anti-abortion extremists".[75] ALF activist Donald Currie was jailed for 12 years and placed on probation for life in Dec 2006 afterwards being institute guilty of planting homemade bombs on the doorsteps of businessmen with links to HLS.[76] HLS director Brian Cass was attacked by men wielding pick-axe handles in Feb 2001. David Blenkinsop was ane of those convicted of the assail, someone who in the by had conducted actions in the proper name of the ALF.[75]

Also in 1999, a freelance reporter, Graham Hall, said he had been attacked after producing a documentary disquisitional of the ALF, which was aired on Channel iv. The documentary showed ALF press officer Robin Webb appearing to give Hall—who was filming undercover while purporting to be an activist—advice about how to make an improvised explosive device, though Webb said his comments had been used out of context. Hall said that, as a result of the documentary, he was abducted, tied to a chair, and had the messages "ALF" branded on his back, before being released 12 hours after with a warning not to tell the police.[77]

In June 2006, members of the ALF claimed responsibility for a firebomb assault on UCLA researcher Lynn Fairbanks, afterwards a firebomb was placed on the doorstep of a firm occupied by her 70-yr-onetime tenant; according to the FBI, it was powerful enough to take killed the occupants, but failed to ignite. The attack was credited past the acting chancellor of UCLA as helping to shape the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act. Beast liberation press officeholder Jerry Vlasak said of the assault: "strength is a poor 2nd selection, only if that's the merely matter that will work ... at that place's certainly moral justification for that."[78] [79] [eighty] Every bit of 2008, activists were increasingly taking protests to the homes of researchers, staging "home demonstrations", which can involve making noise during the night, writing slogans on the researchers' holding, cracking windows and spreading rumours to neighbours.[81]

Operation Backfire [edit]

On 20 January 2006, equally role of Operation Backlash, the U.South. Section of Justice announced charges confronting nine Americans and two Canadian activists calling themselves the "family". At least nine of the xi pleaded guilty to conspiracy and arson for their parts in a string of xx arsons from 1996 through 2001, damage totalled $40 million.[82] The Department of Justice called the acts examples of domestic terrorism. The incidents included arson attacks confronting meat-processing plants, lumber companies, a loftier-tension electric line, and a ski centre, in Oregon, Wyoming, Washington, California and Colorado between 1996 and 2001.[83]

See too [edit]

  • Animate being rights
  • Animal rights and punk subculture
  • Critical animal studies
  • Deep ecology
  • Direct activity
  • Direct Action Everywhere
  • Earth Liberation Front end
  • GANDALF trial
  • Green anarchism
  • Informal Anarchist Federation
  • Open rescue
  • PETA
  • Total liberationism

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b c Best, Steven & Nocella, Anthony J. (eds), Terrorists or Liberty Fighters?, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 8.
  2. ^ For their mission statement, see ALF mission statement Archived 2008-05-11 at the Wayback Machine, accessed June 5, 2010
  3. ^ Coronado, Rod. "Reflections on Prison house and the Needs of Our Motility" Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine, No Compromise, Issue 13, accessed June 5, 2010
  4. ^ "History of the Animal Liberation Movement", Animal Liberation Press Office, accessed June 7, 2010
  5. ^ Best, Steven & Nocella, Anthony J. (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 91.
  6. ^ a b c Blejwas, Andrew; Griggs, Anthony; and Potok, Marker. "Terror from the Right", Southern Poverty Law Center, Summer 2005, accessed June 7, 2010.
  7. ^ a b "From Button to Shove" Archived 2005-02-04 at the Wayback Automobile, Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Report, Fall 2002.
    • Rood, Justin. "Animal Rights Groups and Environmental Militants Make DHS Terrorist List, Right-Wing Vigilantes Omitted" Archived 2008-11-29 at the Wayback Auto, Congressional Quarterly, March 25, 2005.
  8. ^ a b "About NETCU" Archived 2010-03-05 at the Wayback Machine and "What is domestic extremism?" Archived 2011-09-29 at the Wayback Machine, National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit, accessed June 7, 2010.
  9. ^ "Global Terrorism Database Search Result for "Animal Liberation Front end" Graph of incident types per year". The Global Terrorism Database. Archived from the original on xx January 2019. Retrieved 19 Jan 2019.
  10. ^ For the quote from Robin Webb, see "Staying on Target and Going the Distance: An Interview with U.Chiliad. A.L.F. Printing Officer Robin Webb" Archived 2006-06-23 at the Wayback Machine, No Compromise, Issue 22, undated, accessed June five, 2010.
  11. ^ Keith, Shannon. Behind the Mask: The Story Of The People Who Run a risk Everything To Salvage Animals, 2006.
  12. ^ "Investigation after uni bomb notice" Archived 2015-02-07 at the Wayback Car, BBC News, February 27, 2007.
  13. ^ Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 19.
    • Ryder, Richard. Fauna Revolution: Irresolute Attitudes Towards Speciesism. Berg, 2000, p. 167.
    • "The History of the Hunt Saboteurs Association (Part i)" Archived 2008-04-08 at the Wayback Car, American Hunt Saboteurs Association, accessed March one, 2008. See also "Losing the Smell" Archived 2017-07-07 at the Wayback Car, Messages to the Editor, The Guardian, July 29, 2004.
  14. ^ Molland, Noel. "Thirty Years of Directly Activeness" in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Liberty Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 67ff.
    • For a reference to the original Bands of Mercy, see "Information respecting Bands of Mercy" Archived 2013-06-12 at the Wayback Automobile, RSPCA Annual report, 1886, p. 165.
  15. ^ a b Molland, Neil. "Thirty Years of Direct Action" in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Liberty Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, pp. 70–74.
  16. ^ a b c Monaghan, Rachael. "Terrorism in the Proper name of Animal Rights", in Taylor, Maxwell and Horgan, John. The Future of Terrorism. Routledge 2000, pp. 160–161 ISBN 0714650366.
  17. ^ *For the Vegan Prisoners, meet Vegan Prisoners Back up Grouping Archived 2021-01-25 at the Wayback Motorcar, accessed June 6, 2010; "Special Diets merely for the Dedicated", On the Case, Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, consequence 16, Spring 2005, p. five, accessed June six, 2010.
    • For the Animal Liberation Press Office and the High Court ruling, see Brute Liberation Press Office Archived 2005-12-12 at the Wayback Machine, accessed June 6, 2010, and "Oxford wins courtroom ruling over ALF" Archived 2006-11-09 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News, October 13, 2006.
  18. ^ For Arkangel, see Arkangel Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine, accessed June 6, 2010.
    • For Bite Back, see "Bite Dorsum" Archived 2007-11-27 at the Wayback Machine, accessed June 6, 2010.
    • For a story well-nigh the Bite Dorsum report, encounter "Radical animal rights mag issues 2004 'Straight Action' written report" Archived September 26, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, Law Enforcement Bureau Resources Network, January 25, 2005.
    • For No Compromise, run across No Compromise Archived 2007-05-12 at the Wayback Machine, accessed June 6, 2010.
  19. ^ Regan, Tom. The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press, 1983.
  20. ^ All-time, Steven. "Introduction," in All-time and Nocella. (eds.) Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?. Lantern Books, 2004, pp. 24–26.
  21. ^ Isle of man, Keith. From Sunset Till Dawn. Puppy Pincher Press, 2007, p. 55.
  22. ^ Bernstein, Mark. "Legitimizing Liberation", in Best and Nocella. Terrorists or Liberty Fighters?. Lantern Books, 2004, p. 91.
  23. ^ McClain, Carla. "ALF: A Hugger-mugger Interview with a Empathetic Companion", No Compromise, March–April 1996, p. 12, cited in Schnurer, Maxwell. "At the Gates of Hell", in Best and Nocella, Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?, 2004, pp. 115–116.
  24. ^ "Inside the ALF", Dispatches, Channel 4 television, 1998.
  25. ^ "Written report to Congress on the Extent and Effects of Domestic and International Terrorism on Animal Enterprises, Appendix ane" Archived 2017-06-thirty at the Wayback Machine, Usa Section of Justice
  26. ^ Rood, Justin. "Beast Rights Groups and Ecology Militants Brand DHS Terrorist List, Right-Wing Vigilantes Omitted" Archived 2008-11-29 at the Wayback Automobile, Congressional Quarterly, March 25, 2005.
  27. ^ "Speech of John E. Lewis, Deputy Assistant Director, FBI Counterterrorism Division" Archived 2020-10-24 at the Wayback Machine. quaternary Annual International Conference on Public Condom: Engineering and Counterterrorism Counterterrorism Initiatives and Partnerships, San Francisco, California. March 14, 2005.
  28. ^ Terry Frieden, "FBI, ATF address domestic terrorism" Archived 2005-12-20 at the Wayback Machine, CNN, 19 May 2005.
  29. ^ The FBI defines "domestic terrorism" equally "activities that involve acts dangerous to homo life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the Usa or of whatsoever state; announced to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; to influence the policy of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and occur primarily inside the territorial jurisdiction of the Usa." (18 U.s.a.C. § 2331(5)) [one] Archived 2004-09-xv at the Wayback Machine
  30. ^ Best, Steven; Nocella II, Anthony J., eds. (2004). Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Reflections on the Liberation of Animals. Lantern Books. p. 36. ISBN978-1590560549.
  31. ^ For information virtually the banning of Best and Vlasak, run across MacLeod, Donald. "Britain uses hate constabulary to ban animal rights campaigner" Archived 2008-05-08 at the Wayback Automobile, The Guardian, 31 August 2005.
    • Also encounter Blackstock, Colin. Blunkett bars The states animal rights activist from United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland Archived 2020-05-27 at the Wayback Motorcar, The Guardian, August 26, 2004.
    • For Vlasak'due south 2003 statement, see Best, Steven. "Who's Afraid of Jerry Vlasak?" Creature Liberation Press Office, accessed June 6, 2010.
  32. ^ Best, Steven (2014). The Politics of Total Liberation: Revolution for the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 68. ISBN978-1137471116. If physical force is needed to save an animal from set on, then that force is a legitimate form of what I telephone call "extensional self defense force." This principle mirrors The states penal code statutes known as the "necessity defense," which tin be invoked when a accused believed that an illegal human action was necessary to avert great and imminent harm. 1 but needs to aggrandize this concept slightly to embrace actions that are increasingly desperate and necessary to protect animals from the total war against them.
  33. ^ Best, Steven. "Gaps in Logic, Lapses in Politics: Rights and Abolition in Joan Dunayer's Speciesism" Archived 2011-10-03 at the Wayback Machine, drstevebest.org, accessed June 6, 2010.
    • All-time, Steven. "Who's Agape of Jerry Vlasak?", Animal Liberation Press Office, accessed June 6, 2010.
  34. ^ Best, Steven (2014). The Politics of Total Liberation: Revolution for the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 68–69. ISBN978-1137471116.
  35. ^ Bradley, Ed. "Interview With ALF Jail cell Member" Archived 2007-08-08 at the Wayback Motorcar, sixty Minutes, CBS News, November 13, 2005.
  36. ^ Carbone, Larry. What Animals Desire: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy. Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 90, and Orlans, F. Barbara. The Human Use of Animals: Case Studies in Ethical Option. Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 71–76.
    • The footage can be viewed at: Office 1 Archived 2007-02-02 at the Wayback Automobile, Part two Archived 2007-02-04 at the Wayback Auto, Part three Archived 2007-02-02 at the Wayback Machine, Part 4 Archived 2007-02-02 at the Wayback Machine, Role five Archived 2007-02-02 at the Wayback Automobile.
  37. ^ Vocalizer, Peter. Creature Liberation, cited in Best and Nocella. (eds.) Terrorists or Liberty Fighters?. Lantern Books, 2004, pp. 28–29.
  38. ^ "Animal rights human being dies on hunger strike". Lancashire Telegraph. 8 November 2001. Archived from the original on 4 March 2020.
  39. ^ "Barry's life". Arkangel. Archived from the original on 5 April 2005. Retrieved thirteen March 2008.
  40. ^ Hughes, Peter. "Animals, values and tourism — structural shifts in UK dolphin tourism provision", Tourism Management, Volume 22, Issue four, August 2001, pp. 321–329.
    • Too meet "No Dolphinaria in the United kingdom" Archived 2007-11-29 at the Wayback Machine, Born Costless Foundation.The Bellerive Foundation (Switzerland) and the World Society for the Protection of Animals (Now known equally World Animal Protection) were also involved in the campaign.
    • Mann, Keith. From Dusk 'til Dawn: An insider'south view of the growth of the Animal Liberation Motion, Puppy Pincher Press, 2007, p. 167.
  41. ^ For the "reverence of life" quote, see Lee, Ronnie. Peace News, 1974, and for the rest come across Lee and Gary Treadwell in Freedom, 1979, both cited in Stallwood, Kim. "A Personal Overview of Direct Activity" in Best and Nocella. (eds.) Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Lantern Books, 2004, p. 83.
  42. ^ a b Stallwood, Kim. "A Personal Overview of Direct Activity" in Best and Nocella (eds.). Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Lantern Books, 2004, p. 83.
  43. ^ "The human being who hounds the huntsmen" Archived 2008-02-01 at the Wayback Automobile, St Neots Advertiser, December 24, 1975.
  44. ^ Webb, Robin. "Animal Liberation — By 'Whatever Means Necessary'," in All-time and Nocella. (eds.) Terrorists or Liberty Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 77.
  45. ^ Gold, M. Animal Century: A Celebration of Irresolute Attitudes to Animals. Carpenter, 1998, p. 158.
  46. ^ Stallwood, Kim. "A Personal Overview of Directly Activeness" in All-time and Nocella (eds.). Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Lantern Books, 2004, pp. 85–87.
  47. ^ Trends in Fauna Rights and Environmental Extremism" Archived 2004-09-15 at the Wayback Machine, Terrorism 2000/2001", Federal Agency of Investigation.
  48. ^ a b Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 21; Vorsino, Mary. "Last dolphin dies at marine laboratory" Archived 2007-10-30 at the Wayback Machine, Honolulu Star-Bulletin, February 26, 2004. Also see "Biography of Ken LeVasseur" Archived 2007-01-12 at the Wayback Machine, Whales on the Cyberspace, accessed August two, 2009.
  49. ^ "History of the Animate being Liberation Movement", N American Animal Liberation Press Office; "Awe-inspiring Animal Liberation Forepart Deportment – U.s.a." Archived 2008-x-07 at the Wayback Automobile, Creature Liberation Front, accessed June half dozen, 2010.
  50. ^ Guillermo, Kathy Snow. Monkey Business, National Press Books, pp. 69–72.
  51. ^ Newkirk, Ingrid. Costless the Animals: The Amazing True Story of the Animal Liberation Front, 2000; Lowe, Brian M. Emerging Moral Vocabularies. Lexington Books, 2006, p. 92.
  52. ^ Rudacille, Deborah. The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Disharmonize Between Brute Research and Beast Protection. University of California Press, 2001, p. 136.
  53. ^ Orlans, F. Barbara. The Human Use of Animals: Case Studies in Ethical Choice. Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 71–76; Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 22.
  54. ^ McCarthy, Charles R. The Historical Groundwork of OPRRs Responsibilities for Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals", "Reflections on the Organizational Locus of the Office for Protection from Research Risks", Online Ideals Center for Engineering and Science, Oct 28, 2004; accessed June vii, 2010.
  55. ^ United States House Energy Subcommittee on Health and the Environment (1991). NIH Reauthorization and Protection of Health Facilities: Hearings Earlier the Subcommittee on Wellness and the Environs of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Showtime Congress, Second Session, Feb eight, 1990 – Health Facilities Protection and Primate Center Rehabilitation Act (H.R. 3349). Washington, D.C.: U.Due south. Authorities Printing Office. Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 6 February 2015.
  56. ^ Franklin, Ben A. "Going to Extremes for 'Animate being Rights'" Archived 2017-02-19 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, August 30, 1987.
  57. ^ "Pro-Animal ALF Flouts Law in Proper name of Compassion", Sacramento Bee, February 15, 1998.
  58. ^ Siegel, Lee (25 April 1985). "NIH Director Denounces Lab Animals Thefts as 'Acts of Terrorism'". Associated Printing. Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 6 February 2015.
  59. ^ For data about Britches, see Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 22.
    • For the university statement, encounter Group raids labs, takes animals Archived 2012-01-11 at the Wayback Motorcar, Philadelphia Inquirer, April 22, 1985.
  60. ^ a b "Confectionery (Poisoning)". Hansard. 19 Nov 1984. Archived from the original on 12 Jan 2015.
  61. ^ Schweitzer, Glenn E. and Dorsch Schweitzer, Carole. A Faceless Enemy: The Origins of Modern Terrorism. Da Capo Press, 2002, p. xc.
  62. ^ The Guardian, Apr xiv, 1990, and Nov xiv, 1991, cited in Garner, Robert. Animals, Politics and Morality Archived 2016-12-23 at the Wayback Motorcar. Manchester Academy Press, 2004, p. 235.
  63. ^ For the ARM claim of responsibility, see Mann, Keith. From Sunset 'til Dawn: An insider's view of the growth of the Animal Liberation Movement. Puppy Pincher Press, 2007, p. 497
  64. ^ Stallwood, Kim. "A Personal Overview of Direct Action" in Best and Nocella (eds.). Terrorists or Liberty Fighters? Lantern Books, 2004, p. 84.
  65. ^ Hansard, December 14, 1992, column 223.
  66. ^ "Staying on Target and Going the Distance: An Interview with U.K. A.L.F. Press Officer Robin Webb" Archived 2006-06-23 at the Wayback Machine, No Compromise, May 23, 2006, accessed March 5, 2008.
  67. ^ The Times, Dec 21, 1988, and February 24, 1989, and Henshaw, David. Brute warfare: The story of the Animal Liberation Forepart. HarperCollins, 1989, pp. 102–113, cited in Garner, Robert. Animals, Politics and Morality. Manchester University Press, 2004, p. 235.
  68. ^ Mann, Keith. From Sunset Till Dawn. Puppy Pincher Press, 2007, p. 497.
  69. ^ a b c d "Violent Extremism". Animate being Rights Extremism. Understanding Creature Inquiry (UAR). Retrieved 23 March 2019.
  70. ^ Best, Steven. "Introduction," in All-time & Nocella. (eds.) Terrorists or Liberty Fighters?, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 25.
  71. ^ Garner, Robert. Animals, Politics and Morality. Manchester University Printing, 2004, p. 235.
    • Bakery, Steve. Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity, and Representation. University of Illinois Printing, 2001, pp. 201ff.
    • Vines, Gail. "Vets targeted in bombing attacks" Archived 2012-x-xx at the Wayback Automobile, New Scientist, June xvi, 1990.
  72. ^ Mann, Keith. From Dusk Till Dawn. Puppy Pincher Press, 2007, pp. 157–158.
  73. ^ "Met Law apologies after Hampshire Police investigated crime an undercover officeholder committed - The Journal". Archived from the original on 21 Feb 2018. Retrieved 21 February 2018.
  74. ^ Webb, Robin. "Animal Liberation — Past "Any Means Necessary", in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 78.
  75. ^ a b "Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty Threatens Terrorist-Way Attack". Southern Poverty Law Heart. xx September 2002. Archived from the original on 11 March 2016.
  76. ^ Addley, Esther. "Animal Liberation Front bomber jailed for 12 years", The Guardian, December eight, 2006.
  77. ^ "Telly investigator kidnapped and branded 'ALF'" Archived 2017-07-06 at the Wayback Motorcar, The Independent, November 7, 1999, accessed Nov 25, 2009.
  78. ^ "Chancellor taking steps to protect UCLA" Archived 2007-03-01 at the Wayback Machine, Seattle Times, Rebecca Trounson and Joe Mozingo. 27 August 2006
  79. ^ Trounson, Rebecca & Mozingo, Joe. "UCLA to Protect Animal Research" Archived 2006-09-03 at the Wayback Machine, Los Angeles Times, August 26, 2006.
  80. ^ For Vlasak's statement, run into "Terror at UCLA" Archived 2006-ten-04 at the Wayback Machine, Critical Mass, August 22, 2006.
  81. ^ Associated Press (7 July 2008). "Beast Activists Attacking Scientists' Homes". NBC News.
  82. ^ "Homo sentenced to seven years for ecoterrorism fires". Komonews. four June 2007. Archived from the original on 2 April 2012. Retrieved v August 2012.
  83. ^ "Xi Defendants Indicted on Domestic Terrorism Charges" Archived 2006-02-06 at the Wayback Machine, U.Southward. Department of Justice, 20 January 2006. Retrieved 2 October 2006

Further reading [edit]

  • "Terrorism 2000 / 2001" Archived 2021-02-04 at the Wayback Machine, FBI document mentioning the ALF, accessed January ten, 2014.
  • Bond, Walter. Ever Looking Forward. NAALPO, 2011. ISBN 978-0983054740
  • Braddock, Kurt. "The utility of narratives for promoting radicalization: The case of the Animal Liberation Front" Archived 2021-02-04 at the Wayback Machine, Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, Book 8, Number 1, Apr 2015.
  • Tester, Keith. "The British feel of the militant opposition to the agricultural apply of animals" Archived 2021-02-04 at the Wayback Automobile, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Book ii, Number 3, September 1989.
  • Wolf, Screaming (1991). A Declaration of War. NAALPO. ISBN 978-0983054733
  • Young, Peter Daniel (2010). Animal Liberation Forepart: Complete Diary of Actions, The First 30 Years. Voice of the Voiceless Communications Archived 2010-04-10 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 978-0-9842844-0-5
  • Young, Peter Daniel (2021) The A.L.F. Strikes Again: Collected Writings Of The Animal Liberation Front In Northward America. Warcry Communications. ISBN 978-1732709690

External links [edit]

  • North American Fauna Liberation Printing Part
  • Beast Liberation Frontline
  • Talon Conspiracy
  • Bite Dorsum Magazine
  • documentary films on IMDb

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Liberation_Front

Posted by: fieldsbaccerst.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Is The Animal Liberation Front A Terrorist Group In All Countries"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel